In general, law enforcement officers can use electronic surveillance only:
A. if the concerned parties refuse to agree for a consent search.
B. if the parties to be monitored are suspected of drug dealing.
C. if the judge refused to issue warrant on the basis of officers' suspicion.
D. if consent is given by one of the parties to be monitored.
Answer: D
You might also like to view...
What is the difference between a confession and an incriminating statement? How do these relate to the Miranda ruling?
What will be an ideal response?
According to the ruling in California v. Riley (2014), the police:
A. can search cell phones as they are covered by the plain view doctrine. B. do not need to establish probable cause before engaging in cell phone searches. C. need a warrant before engaging in cell phone searches. D. do not need the consent of a cell phone owner to conduct cell phone searches.
Which of the following is an example of proprietary private police security?
A. A grocery store chain hires a company to provide their stores with security guards. B. A bank hires an organization to provide around-the-clock security. C. A celebrity contracts with a company to provide personal protection overnight. D. A retail store hires several individuals to be part of their security department.
______ means that there must be a law that defines the specific action as a crime
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word