The significance of the case of United States v. Granderson (1994 ) is that it clarified:
A) ?what can happen to a probationer whose community sentence is revoked.
B) ?the minimum and maximum sentence lengths for probation.
C) ?that probation cannot be revoked due to the inability to pay one's fines.
D) ?when counsel is mandated for a revocation hearing.
E) ?it clarified the role of the warden in grating probation.
A
You might also like to view...
In which case did the Supreme Court hold that the Fourth Amendment ?protects people, not places??
A) People v. Boettner B) United States v. Jacobsen C) Mapp v. Ohio D) Katz v. United States E) None of the above
A judge in New Jersey ruled that criminals may have their DNA samples destroyed after they complete their prison terms
If the judge had said, "this policy uses persons, via their DNA, as a means to protect society in the future," Kant would have agreed with him. a. True b.False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The need for immediate gratification is an important cause of delinquent and criminal behavior according to the _________ theory.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Most scholars will agree that actus reus, mens rea, and concurrence, are sufficient elements to describe the legal concept of crime. Some scholars, however, will argue that Western law is more complex and requires four additional elements to fully understand the complexities of crime. Explain in detail these four additional elements
What will be an ideal response?