Most scholars will agree that actus reus, mens rea, and concurrence, are sufficient elements to describe the legal concept of crime. Some scholars, however, will argue that Western law is more complex and requires four additional elements to fully understand the complexities of crime. Explain in detail these four additional elements
What will be an ideal response?
Answer: The following must be in the answer:
a. The distinction between causation in fact, and proximate cause.
b. The definition of the "but for" rule.
c. The need for some identifiable harm, or a resulting harm from an action.
d. An explanation that behavior cannot be criminal if no law exists that defines it as such.
e. A discussion on attendant circumstances, or "facts surrounding and event" such as time and place.
f. The existence of attendant circumstances is required in order for all of the elements of the crime to be met.
You might also like to view...
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1. Auto-genocide refers to genocide conducted automatically. 2. Muammar el-Qaddafi was a primary perpetrator of international state-sponsored terrorism for nearly two decades. 3. One purpose of paramilitary death squads is to provide a degree of “deniability” for the state. 4. The Contras fought against the United States in Nicaragua.
The relationship between testosterone and aggressive behavior in young males appears to be moderated by
a. age. b. the social environment. c. genetics. d. prenatal substance abuse.
State constitutions have generally not played a substantially important role in defining civil liberties until recently. Why not? What has been the major reason for the change? By what term is the state resurgence in constitutional law known?
What will be an ideal response?
What is Forensic Photography?
What will be an ideal response?