If an offender chooses to attend drug court, they place themselves in the hands of a who will enforce a mixture of treatment and sanctions in an attempt to cure their addiction
a. judge
b. jury
c. probation officer
d. prosecutor
a
You might also like to view...
According to Berkowitz, high levels of arousal ________ aggressive behavior in certain situations
A) completely dissipate B) cause C) slightly reduce D) facilitate
Summarize the main findings from Stansfield and Williams (2014) big data project examining family violence.
What will be an ideal response?
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1. One argument in favor of the exclusionary rule is that it directly impacts police, as they are the first to feel the impact of excluded evidence. 2. Historically, some jurisdictions have allowed civilians to sit on a board of review of police conduct to investigate cases of suspected abuse of authority, with the power to enact disciplinary action if necessary. 3. As a general rule, defendants must challenge the admissibility of evidence as a pretrial motion to be allowed to appeal a conviction based on that evidence being allowed at trial. 4. Unlawfully seized evidence, inadmissible at trial, can be considered during a habeas corpus hearing. 5. Evidence seized following a failure to follow the knock-and-announce rule is disallowed at trial via the exclusionary rule.
Williams Sanders's study of juvenile gangs in San Diego defined gangs in terms of their:
a. hierarchical organizational structure. b. willingness to use deadly force. c. involvement in money-making activities. d. strong, elected leaders.