Sarah, an employee of Amex Corporation, committed a serious criminal act in an attempt to obtain a large sales order for her employer. A court found her guilty of the felony and also found the corporation guilty of criminal conduct. The company was fined $1 million. The court
A)erred in fining the company since finding both Sarah and the corporation guilty violates the Double Jeopardy Clause of
the Constitution.
B)acted properly if this were a federal proceeding; however, it did not act properly if this were a state proceeding.
C)acted properly in finding Sarah guilty; however it erred in finding the corporation guilty because of the exclusionary rule.
D)acted properly in this case.
D
You might also like to view...
Which of the following refers to the individual person or people for whom a message is intended?
A) Transmission model B) Audience C) Transmitter D) Passive listener E) Encoder
Federal diversity jurisdiction requires that litigants be residing in at least three different states
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
_____ means establishing only one retail outlet in a given area.
A. Intensive distribution B. Wholesale distribution C. Exclusive distribution D. Direct distribution
Brontsky & Co., a member bank of the Fed, receives a notice from the Fed that notifies that it must hold funds equal to 15% of the deposits held by its customers. In this scenario, the 15% is the _____.
A. capital adequacy ratio B. capital requirement C. reserve requirement D. debt ceiling