Why do some scholars suggest that democracy hinders economic growth?
What will be an ideal response?
In democracy, individuals have the right to demand resources from the state. In addition, the interest groups and political parties try to protect and advance the private interests of their supporters at the expense of public interest. The governments respond to the louder and better?organized special?interest groups for increased spending on particular programs rather than to overall public opinion. This leads to an increase in taxes, potentially crowding out money for investment in the private sector. In contrast non-democracies can make better investment decisions with no "crowding out" of the private sector, as they are more insulated from the demands of political parties, interest groups, and lobbies. Hence, scholars suggest that democracy hinders economic growth.
You might also like to view...
In 2010, Russia offered to give Iran nuclear fuel in return for its enriched uranium. This type of nuclear deal can be considered an example of which principle?
A) Dominance B) Reciprocity C) Identity D) Collective interest
Which approach to political research uses empirically observed data to tease out relationships among variables?
a. the statistical method b. the experimental method c. the case study method d. the comparative method
The term soft power refers to
a. any unsuccessful attempt by one nation to influence another. b. military tactics and technologies that are designed to minimize civilian causalities. c. efforts by one nation to influence the people and governments of other nations by persuasion rather than coercion. d. any policy tool that has declined in influence over time
Not all primaries and caucuses are created equal. Certain small states play a disproportionate role in shaping public opinion about the candidates, often because their primary or caucus occurs early. One example of a small state with disproportionate influence is
A. Alaska. B. Delaware. C. North Dakota. D. New Hampshire. E. Montana.