In Zambelli Fireworks Manufacturing Co v. Wood, where Zambelli sued Wood for violating the noncompete agreement in his contract, the appeals court held that:
a. the noncompete agreement was void because it violated common law policies b. the noncompete agreement was void because it violated public policy
c. Wood's specialized knowledge from working at Zambelli, but not customer goodwill, constituted a legitimate business interest that Zambelli had a right to protect through a reasonable restrictive covenant
d. Wood's specialized knowledge from working at Zambelli and established customer goodwill did not constitute legitimate business interests that Zambelli had a right to protect through a reasonable restrictive covenant
e. none of the other choices are correct
e
You might also like to view...
In the work setting, caucusing is not as common or advisable as in the legal setting, because the issues involved in the work setting do not involve the same level of confidentiality or attorney-client privilege
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
Why would a convertible bond increase much more in value than a bond that is not convertible?
What will be an ideal response?
What is the marketing concept? According to the marketing concept, what determines if a sale will actually occur?
What will be an ideal response?
Costs that are incurred no matter how many units of a product are produced or sold are called
A. operating expenses. B. overhead. C. variable costs. D. fixed costs. E. inflexible costs.