What are the three principles of public speaking, and how do you evaluate a speech based on these principles?
What will be an ideal response?
A good standard to use in evaluating a classroom speech involves how well it conforms to the principles of public speaking. You evaluate a speech positively when it follows the principles of public speaking established by the critics, theorists, and practitioners of public speaking. You evaluate it negatively to the degree that it deviates from these principles. The three principles of public speaking are as follows: 1) Speaking on a subject that is worthwhile, relevant, and interesting to listeners. 2) Designing a speech for a specific audience. 3) Constructing a speech that is based on sound research.
You might also like to view...
By the late 19th century, Industrialists quickly learned the value of combating hostility and courting public favor through professional public relations
a. True b. False
Johnny has negative feelings toward members of minority groups. While he is careful to avoid the explicit use of ugly labels, he does vent his beliefs through comments such as, "In my neighborhood, we respect law and order"
Johnny's words may be characterized asa. ethnocentrism. b. supremacism. c. symbolic racism. d. marking.
The Motivated Sequence step that asks the listeners to imagine the results that will follow when they adopt the recommended solution is which of the following?
A) attention B) action C) motivation D) satisfaction E) visualization
A book publisher decides to reprint a novel, The Genius, by Theodore Dreiser, considered by many literary experts to be one of the leading writers of the early 20th century. A district attorney (running for reelection) prosecutes a local bookstore owner under the state’s obscenity laws for selling a copy of the reprinted novel. The basis of the prosecution is that the book contains the following passage: “She accepted first the pressure of his arm, then the slow gentleness with which he caressed her. Resistance seemed almost impossible now, for he held her close—tight within the range of his magnetism. When finally she felt the pressure of his hand upon her quivering limbs, she threw herself back in a transport of agony and delight. ‘No, no, Eugene,’ she begged. ‘No, no! Save
me from myself. Oh, Eugene!’” A jury found the book obscene based on that excerpt (the only part of the book to which the district attorney objected). Will that conviction be upheld on appeal? Why or why not? Discuss the complete test a court would apply. What will be an ideal response?