An intent-to-use application cannot proceed to registration until actual use of the mark in commerce has been shown.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
True
You might also like to view...
What are the consequences of having multiple errors in a legal document from failure to properly proofread and edit?
What will be an ideal response?
In Oliveras v. State, the court held that?
A. ?robbery must be defined as a specific intent offense if it is used to support a charge of felony murder, and several of the jury instructions were erroneous; therefore, the cumulative effect was that Oliveras's convictions should be reversed. B. ?there was insufficient evidence that Oliveras agreed to murder Mendez-Rodriguez with Zambada, aided Zambada in the murder, and took property from Mendez-Rodriguez. C. ?it would follow the rule of lenity and find that the robbery did not supply intent sufficient to hold Oliveras liable for murder under the felony-murder rule. D. ?there was sufficient evidence that Oliveras aided with the murder and robbed the victim to support his convictions, and the court disagreed with Oliveras's assertion that robbery must be defined as a specific intent offense if it is used to support a charge of felony murder.
Hank and Tess have new neighbors who moved in next door. The new neighbors are nice people, but play loud music into the wee hours. Hank and Tess have trouble sleeping because of the music. The loud music would most likely be regarded as a:
A. Public nuisance B. Private nuisance C. Specific nuisance D. Private conversion
On the advice of the salesman at the Dock's Sporting Goods store, Michelle purchases a particular pair of ice skates to wear in figure skating competitions where she lands single and double jumps. At her next competition, Michelle's ankle is shattered when the skate blade collapses; its construction was not strong enough to withstand the force of competition jumps. Which of the following
statements is true? a. Dock's Sporting Goods has breached an express warranty made to Michelle. b. Dock's Sporting Goods has breached an implied warranty of merchantability made to Michelle. c. Dock's Sporting Goods has breach an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose made to Michelle. d. No warranty exists for Dock's Sporting Goods to breach.