Many states require contracts to pay debts barred by a bankruptcy discharge or the statute of limitations to be evidenced by a writing.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
True
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is an example of invasion of privacy?
A. A person providing false statements on a seller's ownership of goods offered for sale B. A tenant continuing to stay in a house even after the lease period has expired C. The act of putting an ad in the paper saying that a person does not pay his or her bills D. The act of wrongfully selling or mortgaging the goods of another
Sam was in an accident as a child and received a blood transfusion, which influences his persuasive speech on blood donation. Sam’s topic was influenced by his
a. background. b. worldview. c. culture. d. field of experience.
When the interviewer follows a predetermined agenda such as a checklist or series of questions, he or she is conducting a structured interview, even though it may not seem structured to the applicant
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Answer the following statements true (T) or false (F)
1. The Taft-Hartley Act makes it illegal for workers (or their unions) to engage in boycotts. 2. As a result of a labor dispute with WaveMakers (a boat manufacturing company), the union organizes a national boycott of WaveMaker boats. When the boycott proves to be unsuccessful in pressuring WaveMakers to concede to the union demands, the union extends its boycott to several other boat manufacturers, hoping they will influence WaveMakers to settle. This action is legal under the Taft-Hartley Act. 3. It is legal for a union and management to negotiate a contract that requires the employer to hire only union workers. 4. The right-to-work provision in Taft-Hartley allows states to pass laws that prohibit unions and management from negotiating union or agency shop agreements. 5. After a successful union organizing attempt at a manufacturing plant in Tennesse, the owners refuse to bargain an initial contract with the union, arguing the state's right-to-work law allows them to "refuse" union representation. The employer's interpretation of the law is correct.