Matt, a politically liberal and progressive man, was raised by adoptive parents whom he adores. He is opposed to abortion, which is not typical amongst his progressive friends, but he is not comfortable in typical anti-choice crowds either. Why might Matt be uniquely situated to facilitate a conversation between these historically polarized groups?
What will be an ideal response?
Answers should center on Matt’s ability to create identification with both groups. His
progressive friends likely will not dismiss him as they would most anti-choice people because
they understand his personal situation. He also would be more likely to create some
identification with the anti-choice group because they would recognize his commitment to the
same value. If he cultivates an argument style that respects both contingents and that both can
identify with, it is more likely that he will be able to manage a more reasonable conversation
than would other advocates not similarly situated.
You might also like to view...
The overriding challenge in mixing is to maintain aesthetic perspective
a. true b. false
What five types of speeches combine deliberative and ceremonial goals?
What will be an ideal response?
As cohesiveness increases among team members, productivity always increases, too
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
The effects of _____ are one of the most difficult audience variables to analyze given the rapid social changes in recent decades
A) gender B) religion C) age D) affectional orientation