Describe how a narrative essay can be used for performance ratings and what advantages and disadvantages it has.
What will be an ideal response?
Perhaps the simplest absolute rating system is the narrative essay, in which the rater is asked to describe, in writing, an individual’s strengths, weaknesses, and potential and to make suggestions for improvement. The assumption underlying this approach is that a candid statement from a rater who is knowledgeable of a ratee’s performance is just as valid as more formal and more complicated appraisal methods. The major advantage of narrative essays (when they are done well) is that they can provide detailed feedback to ratees regarding their performance. On the other hand, essays are almost totally unstructured, and they vary widely in length and content. Comparisons across individuals, groups, or departments are virtually impossible, since different essays touch on different aspects of ratee performance or personal qualifications. Finally, essays provide only qualitative information; yet, in order for the appraisals to serve as criteria or to be compared objectively and ranked for the purpose of an employment decision, some form of rating that can be quantified is essential. Behavioral checklists provide one such scheme.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is NOT an element in a business disparagement action?
a. the defendant made a disparaging remark b. the plaintiff's personal reputation has been injured c. the statement resulted in special damages to the plaintiff d. the defendant either intended to injure the business, knew the statement was false,or recklessly disregarded whether it was true
What is the name of the service on Westlaw that provides access to numerous amounts of medical information, charts, photos, jury verdicts, and medical expert witness lists?
A) Medical Litigator B) MedMal Navigator C) MedMal Lawyer D) Medical Lawyer
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1. A negotiator creates value when he suggests resolutions to a conflict that will satisfy both his interests and the interest of the other party. 2. The main principle of distributive negotiation is that by sharing underlying interests and seeking to understand each others interests,each party may realize greater gains than they might through distributive negotiation. 3. Managers might appropriately use the avoiding strategy in several situations such as when the issues involve matters that can be determined to a subordinate or another manager who has more direct responsibility over the area in question. 4. It might be appropriate for a manager to use a competing strategy when they must make an appropriate decision,such as implementing budget costs or other unpopular cost cutting measures. 5. The verbal channel is considered to be the most specific form of communication.
A case citation may include:
A. a parallel citation. B. the reporter volume number. C. the reporter page number. D. the reporter name. E. all of the above. F. b, c, and d.