How can a researcher avoid exampling?
What will be an ideal response?
Exampling is finding examples for dreamed-up theory after the idea occurred rather than allowing the patterns to emerge from the data. A researcher can protect against this in several ways. The first way to avoid exampling is by incorporating cases that illustrate a point and cases that disprove a point. Second, every assertion made by the researcher should be backed up by no less than three examples. Third, analytic interpretations must be examined carefully be an independent reader to make sure that assertions are not misreading the data, and that there is substantial backing and documentation to support the assertions. Lastly, the researcher should document and discuss inconsistencies in the data to determine if they have invalidated the overall patterns. Ignoring inconsistencies is not forthright.
You might also like to view...
A focus group of 10 adults was chosen to evaluate the performance of a candidate during a presidential debate. They were instructed to rate the candidate on two characteristics, knowledge and delivery, using a scale of 1 (poor) to 10 (superior)
The ratings given the candidate were as follows: Knowledge Rater Rating Delivery A 7 5 B 8 6 C 9 5 D 3 5 E 5 6 F 8 7 G 9 6 H 4 5 I 8 6 J 7 5 a. Find the mode, the median, and the mean for the knowledge ratings. b. Find the mode, the median, and the mean for the delivery ratings. c. On which characteristic was the candidate rated more favorably? What would be an ideal response?
A recommended tool for disarming anger associated with discharged agency clients is:
a. A follow-up phone call b. A follow-up questionnaire c. An open-door policy d. Better communication from the outset
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
Confirmation bias disproves what the social worker believes to be true given the research evidence provided.
The unequal allocation of resources is never justified
Indicate whether the statement is true or false