Fred sued Document Security Company, alleging he had suffered injuries to his hands as a result of attempting to fix a jam in one of Document Security's paper shredders. Fred alleged the shredder was defective because it failed to contain warnings regarding the dangers to fingers and hands while attempting to fix jams. In order to succeed, Fred will have to show:
a. all risk of harm could have been reduced or avoided by the provision of reasonable instructions or warnings by Document Security Company.
b. paper shredders are inherently dangerous products.
c. his injuries would not have occurred but for the absence of the warnings.
d. foreseeable risks of harm could have been reduced or avoided by the provision of reasonable instructions or warnings by Document Security Company.
d
You might also like to view...
What are three specific ratios that are especially useful for creditors and lenders?
Consider the following budget information: materials to be used totals $64,750; direct labor totals $198,400; factory overhead totals $394,800; work in process inventory January 1, 2010, was expected to be $189,100; and work in progress inventory on December 31, 2010, is expected to be 197,600. What is the budgeted cost of goods manufactured?
A) $649,450 B) $657,950 C) $197,600 D) $1,044,650
What is the standard deviation of demand during their lead time?
A) 45 phones B) 64 phones C) 90 phones D) 109 phones
For a particular item the usage is 2000 units per year, the ordering cost is $10, the inventory
carrying cost is 20% and the unit cost is $5. The economic order quantity is: A) 20 units. B) 2000 units. C) 200 units. D) 400 units. E) 4000 units.