Differentiate between verbal aggressiveness and argumentativeness. Why can it be advantageous to understand this distinction?
What will be an ideal response?
The ideal answer should include:
- Verbal aggressiveness is a method of winning an argument by inflicting psychological pain, by attacking the other person's self-concept.
- Argumentativeness differs greatly as it is a constructive approach that refers to one's willingness to argue for a point of view and speak one's mind on significant issues.
- Understanding the difference can help you understand reasons why things go wrong at times and how you might use conflict to improve rather than damage relationships.
- Argumentativeness can be useful quality to cultivate, can help enhance relationships between subordinates and supervisors in the workplace, and argumentative individuals are often seen as having greater credibility.
You might also like to view...
What is the term used to describe situations when a person is compelled to act in a way that is discrepant from his or her beliefs?
a. selective exposure b. Induced discrepancy c. induced compliance d. dissonance compulsion
Recall the three primary elements of the attribution process. Describe how attributions may be positive or negative depending upon the three elements
What will be an ideal response?
Social orders that are characterized by specialization, division of labor, and interdependence are said to have ________ solidarity
a. mechanical b. organic c. spontaneous d. reflexive
Jennifer, a professor of psychology, was recently asked to deliver a speech about human relationships. While addressing the group of college students, she started her speech with the statement, "Remember the times when there were no cell phones…" In this scenario, which of the following audience demographic characteristics is Jennifer ignoring?
A) ?Sex B) ?Ethnicity C) ?Age D) ?Occupation