In the video, the teacher puts students together, ostensibly to work together to study Romeo and Juliet, but whose real purpose was to see what students get out of cooperative learning
Regardless of what aspect of Romeo and Juliet they were studying, students had several things to say about working together, compared to working at home. From their comments, was it better working in a group? What did students mention about the experience? Would you say that students experienced any "social facilitation" in the group? Was there any conflict, and, if not, why not?
Answer:
All students agreed it was more fun. One student said more interesting ideas were generated. It is likely that students experienced some social facilitation in that they wanted to contribute, and other students appeared to stimulate them to do that. In addition, in one group, students were having trouble with the word "imagery," and so bringing together the resources of several students helped them get through that confusion. There appeared to be no conflict, in part because all students seemed focused on the common goal of whatever group they were in.
You might also like to view...
_____ is the process in which sensory information is changed into neural impulses
Fill in the blank with correct word
_____ Assimilation is never present without accommodation
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Although there are many major theories of human development, your textbook organizes them by looking at the stand they take on what three basic issues? Briefly describe the opposing views taken on each basic issue
What will be an ideal response?
Compare and contrast the philosophical positions of dualism and monism. To which of these positions does modern neuroscience subscribe? Provide research evidence to support your claim.
What will be an ideal response?