In City of Chicago v. Morales, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the city's anti-gang ordinance was unconstitutional because it
a. violated equal protection
b. discriminated against blacks.
c. unreasonably interfered with First Amendment rights.
d. was void for vagueness.
d
You might also like to view...
What are no contest pleas?
What will be an ideal response?
Answer the following statements true (T) or false (F)
1. In a closing argument to a jury it is proper for a lawyer to comment on the weight of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses. 2. For purpose of ruling whether to grant a defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal (directed verdict), a trial judge must view the evidence in a light most favorable to the defendant. 3. A witness with proper credentials can be received as an expert, may testify based on personal knowledge, and may respond to hypothetical questions that assume the existence of facts the evidence tends to establish. 4. In 1990 the Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause absolutely prohibits states from using one-way closed circuit television to receive a child’s testimony in a child abuse case.
Arson-for-profit crimes are a form of enterprise crime
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
__________ refers to the cessation of criminal activity
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).