Compare and contrast carcinoma in the head of the pancreas versus carcinoma elsewhere in the pancreas
What will be an ideal response?
Carcinoma in both locations tends to be aggressive. A carcinoma in the head of the pancreas can obstruct the common bile duct resulting in obstructive jaundice. A carcinoma elsewhere in the pancreas produces no specific symptoms and is often far advanced when initially detected.
You might also like to view...
A nurse is preparing for the delivery of a newborn with a known diaphragmatic hernia defect. Which equipment should the nurse prepare for use?
1. Appropriate bag-valve-mask system 2. Sterile gauze and saline 3. Soft arm restraints 4. Equipment for intubation
The female nurse identifies that many of the power positions in her organization are held by male nurses
Which strategies should the nurse use to improve her image and increase her power? Note: Credit will be given only if all correct choices and no incorrect choices are selected. Standard Text: Select all that apply. 1. Identify what she really wants 2. Keep her focus on her unit, not the entire organization 3. Prioritize her needs in order of importance 4. Identify her current resources 5. Determine who stands in the way of what she wants
A null hypothesis is stated. The null hypothesis is, "There is no difference between 10 mcg and 20 mcg of vitamin D3 in prevention of osteoporosis." What are the implications of this statement, concerning that hypothesis and type I error?
(Select all that apply.) a. Rejecting the null hypothesis when it actually is false means that the researcher has made a type I error in concluding that there is a difference between 10 mcg and 20 mcg of vitamin D3 in preventing osteoporosis. b. Making the statement is itself a type I error. c. Whether the null hypothesis is true or not makes no difference in terms of type I error. d. Whether or not the researcher rejects the null hypothesis makes no difference in terms of type I error. e. Rejecting the null hypothesis when it actually is false means that the researcher concludes that there is a difference between 10 mcg and 20 mcg of vitamin D3 in preventing osteoporosis, and there is no error. f. Rejecting the null hypothesis when it actually is true means that the researcher concludes that there is no difference between 10 mcg and 20 mcg of vitamin D3 in preventing osteoporosis, but the researcher thinks there is and has made a type I error.
A criticism of situational approach is
a. It is unclear how followers move along the developmental continuum b. The research does not support a universal leadership style c. Research does not clearly support the theoretical framework d. Flexibility and adaptability are unreasonable behavioral expectations