In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court rule that the federal government cannot force private companies to cover services to which it objects on religious grounds?
a. Hollingsworth v. Perry (2013)
b. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (2014)
c. District of Columbia v. Heller (2010)
d. National Federation of Business v. Sebelius (2012)
b
You might also like to view...
What is the effect of ambivalence on people's expressed opinions?
A. It tends to result in respondents being less likely to answer questions. B. The response to the pollster's questions depends on which considerations come to mind first and seem most weighty. C. People are more likely to fall back on their elaborately structured attitudes to fit a new issue into their mental framework. D. People discount the importance of opinion leaders and prefer to gather as much information as possible so they can make a firm decision.
Which elected official in Texas is responsible for the administration of the state tax system?
a. treasurer b. comptroller of public accounts c. secretary of state d. attorney general e. lieutenant governor
According to the criteria listed in the text, is Israel "unquestionably democratic"?
a. Yes, because it has met the criteria for over 30 years. b. Yes, because it is part of the European continent. c. Yes, because its Jewish citizens participate in free, competitive elections. d. Yes, because it is part of the United Nations. e. No, because it limits the civil right and liberties of its non-Jewish residents.
Which of the following instances best exemplifies the doctrine of nullification?
A. The president vetoes a congressional law because he believes that its provisions are unconstitutional. B. A state government declares that a federal law, which it is unconstitutional, will not be enforced within the state. C. The Supreme Court overturns a state law by declaring it constitutional. D. Congressmen repeal a law passed by an earlier Congress because they believe that the law is unconstitutional. E. The Supreme Court overturns a federal law by declaring it unconstitutional.