After working on the defense side of asbestos litigation for many years, Paralegal Kawika decides he wants to work for a small firm and branch out away from asbestos into real estate or family law. Kawika sends out some resumes and gets a call from a law firm that does primarily real estate and family law but does represent some asbestos plaintiffs. Kawika should
A) interview with this firm but bring a list of his current clients with him so they can check for conflicts.
B) interview with this firm and accept an offer from them only after getting a written waiver of the conflict from his current employer
C) not bother to interview with this firm because the conflict of interest is obvious and no asbestos plaintiffs lawyer would hire him.
D) interview with this firm and accept an offer from them only after getting a written waiver of any potential conflicts from the new employer
B
You might also like to view...
Define element.
What will be an ideal response?
Once an annulment has been decreed, the phrase “annulled marriage” is more technically correct that the phrase “attempted marriage.”
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Describe what a situation with equal validity between groups but unequal prediction would look like. What type of selection would this result, and what should the organization do about it?
What will be an ideal response?
Do you think professionalism is important in the field of court reporting? Why or why not?
What will be an ideal response?