In writing a historical research report, it is best to:
a. avoid mentioning alternative interpretations of events proposed by other scholars.
b. leave most of the interpretation of data to the reader rather than impose your own point of view.
c. point out the weaknesses in the arguments or assertions you are making.
d. discuss the weaknesses, but not the strengths, of arguments put forth by other
scholars.
c
You might also like to view...
Discuss vision, the visual system, and problems that can occur in this system that impact a child’s vision. Give examples of particular problems and their impact on the developing child
What will be an ideal response?
Compared to autocratic groups, democratic groups have:
a. less motivation to work b. more discontent c. less group-centered spirit d. higher productivity
The data analyst decided to run a five parameter multi-level linear model, using the same outcome variable Satisfaction, which measured guest satisfaction on a ten-point scale. He now had five parameters in his model: Satisfactionx (guest’ satisfaction with the hotel chain prior to them staying, measured on a ten-point scale); Sex (guests’ gender); Age (guests’ ages); Hotel (the 8 hotels in the chain); and Duration (measuring duration of each guest’s stay in days). The log-likelihood for the five-parameter model was 1689. How does this compare to his previous model?
A. The five parameter model is no better a fit than the previous one B. The previous model was a better fit C. The five parameter model is a better fit D. Both models are flawed
Each of the following constitutes a plausible rival hypothesis for the single-group pretest-posttest design EXCEPT
a) History b) Pretesting c) Maturation d) Diffusion of treatment