What did Samuel Huntington mean by the clash of civilizations? Does his argument come from the realist, liberal, or identity perspective, and why?
What will be an ideal response?
Varies. The clash of civilizations is a thesis advanced by Samuel Huntington that past and future global conflicts can be traced along the fault lines among nine major world civilizations. Though Huntington suggests that civilizations were more hardwired in people than the ideological differences that characterized the Cold War or the cultural and nation-state differences that had divided Europe earlier, ostensibly an identity argument, the clash of civilizations remains a realist argument because it focuses on anarchy and the struggle for power as the foundational driver of international outcomes, while identities and states may change throughout time.
You might also like to view...
Describe the Supreme Court's decision in National Federation of Independent Business, et al. v. Sebelius, and evaluate its significance for federalism in the United States
Answer:
More Texans support ___________ than ____________
a. ?legalizing marijuana, immigration overhaul b. the death penalty, a pathway to citizenship for illegal aliens c. ?cutting education funding, closing an adult prison d. pro-choice rights, the death penalty
The most commonly used statistical analysis for the single-variable, within-subjects experiment is
A) a chi-square test. B) a t-test for independent groups. C) a simple ANOVA. D) a repeated-measures ANOVA.
Prior restraint is the same as
a. muckraking. b. libel. c. censorship. d. the equal time rule. e. slander.