Compare and contrast the IEP and the IFSP
What will be an ideal response?
10 Prove to the reader that you have carefully and clearly compared and contrasted the IEP and IFSP. Provide thoughtful, insightful, and practical examples that highlight the differences and similarities between them.
8 Prove to the reader that you understand the differences and similarities between the IEP and IFSP. Provide several thoughtful and practical examples of how they are different.
6 Prove to the reader that you understand some of the differences and similarities between the IEP and IFSP. Provide few examples, which may lack accuracy.
4 Provide some information that compares and contrasts the IEP and IFSP. Examples provided for only one or two situations, and may be inaccurate.
2 Provide little evidence of full understanding of either the IEP or the IFSP. Give no clear examples.
You might also like to view...
School bonding is primarily caused by which of the following?
a. secure attachment to the mother b. close relationships with teachers and others at school c. supported transitions in and within schools d. a wide variety of extracurricular activities
Research by Shaughnessy and Burger in 1985 showed that the following percent of students entering high school geometry functioned below level 2 of the Van Hiele model
a) 10%. b) 30%. c) 50%. d) 70%. e) 90%.
Rose is sure that any significant differences in her reading intervention study will favor those children who were in her treatment condition. She therefore will not consider rejecting the null hypothesis that the groups are different in favor of her control condition. Rose will then
a. use a non-parametric test of significance. b. apply a two-tailed test of significance. c. apply a one-tailed test of significance. d. use descriptive findings only to examine her data.
What is the mean square for the main effect of factor A (MSA)?
a. 3.81
b. 160.11
c. 122.81
d. 75.31