Pransit, a truck driver, was involved in a truck collision with a passenger car driver by Sanjay. He sued Sanjay for negligence and Sanjay defended by claiming that Pransit was negligent in his driving. The jury heard both sides of the case and was instructed by the judge on the rules of negligence and defense of comparative negligence. They jury verdict concluded that Pransitsuffered $60,000
damages and Sanjay was 75% negligent and Pransit was 25% negligent in contributing to his own harm. Pransit will recover.
a. $15,000.
b. $45,000
c. $60,000
d. nothing.
b
You might also like to view...
It is alleged that markets fail, in some situations, to insure a fair price and thereby limit consumers' freedom. Which statement does not support that allegation?
A. Monopolistic pricing limits the variety of products available to consumers. B. The more uniformity of prices one finds within an industry, the less likely it is that competition exists. C. From the utilitarian perspective, consumers are always benefited by low prices and balancing the benefits to buyers from low prices with the benefits to sellers of high prices is the only ethical pricing issue. D. Sellers extract extraordinarily high prices in situations where consumers have few options for obtaining a needed product.
Which one of the following companies is most likely to use job order costing?
A) a gold refinery B) a law firm C) a surfboard manufacturer D) a soft drink company
A buying signal is defined as anything the prospect says or does to indicate readiness to buy.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
What is the danger of a unilateral approach?
a. Things may not get done b. Stakeholders may feel their concerns are not heard or valued and resist the change c. Employees may be given too much power and overtake the change process d. It is likely to be ineffective because employees will just ignore it