Define victim precipitation, distinguish between active and passive precipitation, and explain how the concept differs from that of victim blaming. Identify the three ways in which victims contribute to their own victimization and give an example of each. Discuss Marvin Wolfgang’s research into victim precipitated homicides
What will be an ideal response?
Answer: Answers should include a basic definition of victim precipitation as any contribution made by the victim to the criminal event. They should also explain the concepts of active precipitation, which involves direct provocation by the victim, and passive precipitation, which involves unknowing encouragement of the offender by the victim. Victim facilitation, victim provocation, and victim initiation should each be defined and an example of each presented. Answers should also review Marvin Wolfgang’s study of homicides in Philadelphia in the 1940s and 1950s, in which he determined that 26% were victim precipitated. Some discussion of the causative factors in victim precipitated homicides should also be included.
You might also like to view...
This can be understood as having been poured out and permitted or caused to spread out freely, as when crime spreads from one area to another over time or when the benefits of crime prevention tend to be even greater than those that are intended
because they spread to other types of crime. A. Displacement B. Epidemic C. Diffusion D. None of the above.
Involuntary ______ is a legal defense in which the accused claims they were forced to consume alcohol or drugs, causing them to be so drunk or high that they were unable to form mens rea.
A. intoxication B. automatism c. consent D. entrapment
The _______________ ____________ refers to the belief that emphasis in the U.S. is placed on monetary and material success
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
The U.S. Supreme Court has held that although a vehicle stop is a form of seizure, the motorist is not fully protected by the Fourth Amendment. Explain the reasons given by the Supreme Court in this decision. Do you agree? Why or why not?
What will be an ideal response?