In the landmark case of Goldberg v. Kelly, Kelly was a New York City resident receiving welfare aid under the federal program, Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). The New York City Social Service agency terminated her benefits. The agency told Goldberg that she could request a formal hearing after her benefits were terminated. She sued claiming she had a right to a hearing before her
AFDC benefits were terminated. The U.S. Supreme Court held
a. as welfare benefits provide food, clothing, and shelter, Kelly had a "due process" right to a hearing before termination.
b. as welfare benefits are not a property owned by Kelly, she did not have a right to a hearing prior to the revocation of welfare benefits.
c. that Kelly had a right to a hearing before the Supreme Court before welfare benefits could be denied.
d. that Kelly had a right to a hearing 30 days after the termination of welfare benefits to determine if the agency had applied the qualification rules correctly.
a
You might also like to view...
International status is the status of
A. third-country nationals. B. employees of international organizations. C. every expatriate employee. D. the IC employee who is receiving all applicable allowances and bonuses for the place of residence and employment.
The evolution of management thought is divided into ________ major sections.
A. five B. three C. six D. two E. four
Gamma Corporation has sales of $120,000, a contribution margin of $48,000, and a net operating income of $12,000. The company's degree of operating leverage is:
A. 4.0 B. 10.0 C. 4.8 D. 2.5
Which of the following statements is (are) true with regard to the ISO commercial crime coverage forms?
I. The discovery version only covers losses which occur during the policy period. II. The loss-sustained version covers losses which occur during the policy period and the loss is discovered during the policy period or within one year after the policy expires. A) I only B) II only C) both I and II D) neither I nor II