Employee versus Independent Contractor. Stephen Hemmerling was a driver for the Happy Cab Co Hemmerling paid certain fixed expenses and abided by a variety of rules relating to the use of the cab, the hours that could be worked, the solicitation of
fares, and so on. Rates were set by the state. Happy Cab did not withhold taxes from Hemmerling's pay. While driving a cab, Hemmerling was injured in an accident and filed a claim against Happy Cab in a Nebraska state court for workers' compensation benefits. Such benefits are not available to independent contractors. On what basis might the court hold that Hemmerling is an employee? Explain.
Employee versus independent contractor
The Supreme Court of Nebraska held that Hemmerling and Happy Cab had an employment relationship primarily on the basis of control. The contract between the parties "vests the exclusive control, supervision, and possession of the taxicab in Happy Cab. * * * Happy Cab had the right to control the methods or means used by Hemmerling in the course of operating the taxicab by virtue of its exclusive control over the taxicab." Happy Cab "exercised such control," by establishing and enforcing a variety of rules relating to the use of the cab, solicitation of fares, and so on. Other factors supporting the existence of an employment relationship included that "Hemmerling was not engaged in a distinct occupation or business from that of Happy Cab * * * . The type of work is that which can be done by employees rather than specially skilled independent contractors." Also, "[t]he net effect of [the contract] is that Happy Cab supplied the instrumentality of the trade." Hemmerling's ability to control his profit was limited, because he "was faced with fixed expenses * * * [and a] ceiling was placed on Hemmerling's income given that the rates were set by the [state] and that he could drive no more than 12 hours in any 1 day." The only factor in support of an independent contractor relationship was that Happy Cab did not withhold taxes.
You might also like to view...
Functional congruence in the environment refers to ______.
a. how well something with a functional purpose fits in the environment in which it serves that purpose b. other people in the environment and the congruent function they perform c. the proportion of style over substance for a given environmental component d. how well service functions work together
Loss or gain on redemption of bonds is computed as the difference between:
a. the carrying value and the face value of the bonds. b. the issue price and the face value of the bonds. c. the call price and the face value of the bonds. d. the call price and the carrying value of the bonds.
After World War II, business began to change in many long-lasting ways. Which of the following is least likely to have caused this shift?
A. Opening up of production capacity dominated for years by war production B. Advent of readily available mainframe computing capability C. Pent-up demand for consumer goods and services after the war D. Focus on sales orientation with the objective of achieving short-term profits E. Desperate need to regain a normalcy of day-to-day life after years of war
Victoria had to write a letter to a job applicant telling him that he was not selected for a position. Because she really liked the applicant, she wrote in the rejection letter, "I thought you were our top candidate." What has Victoria done that might lead to legal difficulties?
A) She is guilty of the "good-guy syndrome." B) She has used careless language. C) She has used abusive language. D) She has done nothing wrong.