Liz and Jeff live in California, a state that recognizes community property. Jeff is a machinist who makes $30,000 a year. Liz is the owner of a franchise where her take-home profit is approximately $75,000 a year. Jeff and Liz purchased a house during their marriage wherein Liz paid three-fourths of the purchase price and Jeff paid one-fourth. Which of the following statements is correct with
regard to Jeff and Liz?
a. Each owns one-half of the real property and other assets they acquire during the marriage.
b. The community property rules do not allow Jeff and Liz to maintain separate ownership of assets they each bring to the marriage or inherit.
c. Community property can be sold by Jeff or Liz without consent by the other.
d. Jeff owns one-fourth of the property and Liz owns three-fourths.
a
You might also like to view...
At the organization Jim works for, he is repeatedly harassed by the majority of his coworkers. Jim is being
a. bullied. b. mobbed. c. threatened. d. fired.
Evidence suggests that two-sided arguments work best when:
a. The audience is not well-educated b. The audience will not be exposed to any other form of counterpersuasion c. The audience initially agrees with your position d. You want your message to endure e. None of the above
_____ refers to communication by marketers that informs, persuades, and reminds potential buyers of a product in order to influence an opinion or elicit a response
a. Distributive communication b. Perceptual communication c. Promotion d. Transmission
In Weyerhaeuser v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber, where Weyerhaeuser was accused of predatory bidding for raw timber to drive out a competitor, the Supreme Court held Weyerhaeuser was:
a. not guilty because predatory bidding does not the violate Robinson-Patman Act, predatory pricing does b. not guilty as there was no evidence it used its bidding power to raise output prices c. guilty as its market share increased to 65 percent, which was evidence of monopolistic impact d. guilty as it raised prices of output after it drove out the competition by buying most of the inputs e. none of the other choices