In Freeman v. San Diego Assn. of Realtors, most of the real estate Multiple Listing Services joined together to provide their service to real estate agents. The association charged all realtors the same price. When challenged as price fixing, the appeals court held that:
a. the association was not engaged in illegal price fixing because it was not charging more for the same services than the most efficient association
b. the association was not engaged in illegal price fixing because it made the industry more efficient
c. the association was engaged in illegal price fixing because it was charging far more for the same services than the most efficient association
d. the association was engaged in illegal price fixing, but it was improving the industry's efficiency so it could be overlooked
e. the association itself was illegal
c
You might also like to view...
Which of the following statements is true about patent infringement in the U.S.?
A. The court grants an automatic injunction in cases of infringement. B. A patent holder is entitled to monetary damages in case of infringements. C. The court holds only the infringer accountable for the unlawful activities and accomplices are not considered liable under the U.S. infringement law. D. There is no effect on the importation of foreign goods that infringe upon U.S. patent rights.
If you are a student in a legal studies department, is your department’s curriculum consistent with SCOP or AAfPE guidelines?
What will be an ideal response?
The Consumer Leasing Act would apply to a lease of furniture for an apartment for a year
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
What is integrated marketing communications (IMC)?
What will be an ideal response?