Did the Court hold that the Alexander v. Gardner-Denver decision precluded arbitration of employment discrimination claims?
No. The Court distinguished the present case from the Gardner-Denver decision. It stated the Gardner-Denver decision involved the issue of whether arbitration of collective bargaining contract-based claims precluded subsequent judicial resolution of statutory claims, not the enforceability of an agreement to arbitrate statutory claims. The arbitration in Gardner-Denver occurred in the context of a collective bargaining agreement, and thus there was concern about the tension between collective representation and individual statutory rights that is not applicable in this case. It was also not decided under the FAA.
You might also like to view...
The town of Genter recently witnessed a devastating hurricane that crippled the town's infrastructure. Q-Mart, a retail chain that plans to open a new retail store in Genter, organizes a program to help the people of Genter
The program consists of providing free meals to those who lost their dwellings in the hurricane. What section of the marketing microenvironment is Q-Mart most likely trying to reach? A) suppliers B) marketing intermediaries C) local publics D) competitors E) employees
The detailed records of purchases and sales maintained under the perpetual inventory system make which costing method more practical than when a periodic system is used?
A) Specific identification B) Average-cost C) LIFO D) FIFO
Which clause of the U.S. Constitution permits the government to exercise the power of eminent domain?
A) Takings B) Equal Protection C) Commerce D) Privileges and Immunities
A company that uses lead scoring numerically rates its best prospective customers to identify traits that make the customer more likely to purchase.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)