On the basis of the Schmidt case and the cases cited therein, determine the constitutional validity of the following: a. A city ordinance requiring all-adult residences only. b. A city zoning master plan that designates certain areas as adult-only
residential areas. c. A state statute that prohibits landlords from refusing to rent property located in all-adult subdivisions to families with children.
a. Invalid
b. Probably valid
(1 ) Valid purpose - quiet
(2 ) Statute related to purpose
(3 ) So long as no housing shortages
c. Arizona has such a statute - A.R.S. Section 33-303. The courts have held the statute applies only to rental properties, not owner-occupied properties.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is not an advantage of issuing long-term debt?
a. The stockholders do not relinquish any control. b. The interest is tax-deductible. c. The risk of becoming bankrupt is reduced. d. Increased earnings accrue to the stockholders.
Natural resources are
a. depleted as they are extracted. b. current assets. c. recorded at market value. d. all of these.
Effective speakers spend their time practicing the body of their presentations because the audience will remember the main information more than the introduction and conclusion
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Under the common law, in order to be enforceable, a modification of an existing contract must be supported by mutual consideration
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false