What did the court decide in Gonzales v. Google, Inc, 234 F.R.D. 674 (N.D. Cal. 2006), about privacy with Internet search engines?
What will be an ideal response?
The court in Gonzales v. Google, Inc., 234 F.R.D. 674 (N.D. Cal. 2006) held that Google was compelled only to generate a list of URLs but was not required to turn over actual user search queries because of privacy interests pursuant to a government subpoena.
You might also like to view...
What are the different types of bailment contracts? How does the type of bailment affect the duty of care?
What will be an ideal response?
When there are two pending patent applications for the same patent for a new technology, priority will be given to the company that is the "first to invent" rather than the company that is the "first to file" a patent application
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
During voir dire, the parties try to identify veniremen who may be struck for cause. The party who would like the potential challenge for cause to be denied by the judge will
a. try to get the opposing counsel to admit there's no prejudice. b. try to get the opposing counsel to use a peremptory challenge. c. try to get the potential juror to state that she can be fair. d. try to get the potential juror to state that he can't be fair.
What the nonbreaching party expected to give in the upper right quadrant.?
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)