What implications exist as a result of the varying state evidence laws?
What will be an ideal response?
The issue of state sovereignty, alien to most cultures, is fundamental to the American system of criminal justice. Each state is sovereign—having its own constitution, criminal code, and rules of procedure. Such sovereignty is limited only by provisions of the U.S. Constitution that directly apply to the states. Although states may not abridge the rights guaranteed under the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, they may enhance or further protect those liberties at their discretion. Thus, with the exception of constitutional mainstays, states remain independent in their interpretation of evidentiary rules. This often results in inconsistency across state lines
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is not an ethical issue arising from privatization of prisons?
a. Will the state receive the benefits for which it paid when retaining a private correctional company? b. How will private prisons deal with the issue of use of deadly force? c. Is it appropriate for anyone but the state to meet out punishment? d. Will private prisons increase the demand for a constant flow of inmates?
If a child is injured and the physician is uncertain of whether the injury is physical child abuse, should the physician alert the police? Why? Why not?
What will be an ideal response?
Variables that can assume an infinite number of quantities are:
a. discrete. b. continuous. c. independent. d. dependent.
Define confession and admission and discuss how they are different
What will be an ideal response?