In Slater Numismatics v. Driving Force, Driving Force was set up by former employees of a firm Slater worked closely with. Driving Force then move to capture business from a major client of Slater. Slater sued for interference with contractual relations. The appeals court held that Slater
a. presented a strong case for intentional interference as Driving Force appeared to make is hard for Slater to perform its contractual duties
b. could sue for intentional interference because Driving Force was shown to have "profit motives" for attempting to take away business
c. had been defrauded by Driving Force
d. could not sue Driving Force because it was a matter of "hard but honest competition"
e. none of the other choices are correct
a
You might also like to view...
Asking for a claim is the same as asking for a settlement to a problem
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
Julian recognizes that her sales numbers are low for the month of June. When she asks around, she realizes that everyone has low numbers for the month. This is an example of a high degree of ______.
A. anonymity B. distinctiveness C. consistency D. consensus
Which of the following statements is true about where some countries are with regard to sustainable supply chains?
a. U.S. companies are ahead of companies in Europe. b. Firms in India and China have caught up with European countries. c. both A and B d. neither A nor B
Select the most accurate statement about sources found on the Web
A) Information posted at most sites has undergone the same editing and scrutiny given to articles in scholarly publications. B) Researchers can safely assume that the information posted on websites by individuals and companies is reputable. C) Wikis, blogs, and discussion forum entries are short-lived and change constantly. D) Wikipedia is reliable and should be used when conducting any scholarly research.