In the Illinois Tool Works, Inc v. Independent Ink, Inc case discussed in the text, the question was whether a patented product in a tying arrangement creates a presumption of market power in that product
a. The court upheld earlier law and ruled that the existence of a patent in a tying arrangement creates a presumption of market power.
b. The court ruled that a tying arrangements involving a patented product should be evaluated under the rule of reason standard rather than under the per se rule.
c. The court ruled that a tying arrangements involving a patented product should be evaluated under the per se rule rather than under the rule of reason standard.
d. Overturning prior law the court ruled that the matter was irrelevant because all tying arrangements are illegal regardless of whether or not a patented product is involved.
c
You might also like to view...
Colin has been directed by his boss to determine if the company is meeting customers' service quality expectations. One of Colin's problems is that services are ________, making evaluation of service quality difficult.
A. indefinable B. unequally distributed C. substantial D. intangible E. quantifiable
In 2013, international giving accounted for about what portion of U.S. philanthropy?
a. 10 percent b. 50 percent c. 4 percent d. 2 percent e. It was too little to be reported
How might the use of atypical models have helped Gaultier’s success?
What will be an ideal response?
Lincoln, Inc., Washington, Inc., and Adams, Inc., form Presidential Suites Partnership on February 15, 20X9. Now, Presidential Suites must adopt its required tax year-end. The partners' year-ends, profits interests, and capital interests are reflected in the table below. Given this information, what tax year-end must Presidential Suites use, and what rule requires this year-end? Presidential Suites Partnership Year-EndProfitsCapitalLincoln, Inc.3/3135%30%Washington, Inc.7/3130%40%Adams, Inc.11/3035%30%
What will be an ideal response?