Which of the following was the result at the U.S. Supreme Court level in the case of Board of Education of Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. Earls, the case in the text involving whether a school system requiring student-athletes to take a drug test without any suspicion of drug use violates the Fourth Amendment?
a. That individualized suspicion is not a consideration in determining whether a search is reasonable and that the searches at issue were, therefore, constitutional.
b. That the searches were unconstitutional because no individual suspicion was present.
c. That the searches were unconstitutional because minors were involved regardless of whether or not individual suspicion was present.
d. That individualized suspicion is not always required and that the searches in the case were constitutional.
d
You might also like to view...
Explain the three marketing metrics that should be incorporated into every company's financial reporting
What will be an ideal response?
The debtor named in a promissory note is called the payee
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which of the following is TRUE?
A) A contract with a mentally incompetent person is always enforceable. B) A mentally incompetent person can only get out of a contract if the other party knew, or should have known, of the incompetency at the time of entering into the contract. C) The law of capacity applies to drunkenness as well as mental incompetency. D) A person who is using illegal drugs at the time they made a contract cannot use that as a reason to get out of a contract they have made E) Both B and C
What is the average lateness of these seven jobs if they are scheduled using the critical ratio criterion?
Job Process Time Due Date Job 1 15 23 Job 2 7 15 Job 3 12 34 Job 4 8 16 Job 5 11 27 Job 6 10 19 Job 7 13 28 A) 24.3 B) 21.7 C) 22.5 D) 23.4