Makiba conducts a study and finds p = .01. She then concludes that these results prove her alternative hypothesis. Explain what is wrong with her conclusion.
What will be an ideal response?
with her conclusion.
Ans: You can never prove something with statistics. Because statistical significance is based on probability there is always some chance of making an error, and in this case there is 1% chance of making a Type I error.
You might also like to view...
One of the main reasons that information published in scientific journals is trustworthy is because
a. these journals pay for fact checkers to verify information before it is published. b. these journals generally post information online before it is published so others can review it. c. the articles are peer-reviewed by other professionals prior to publication. d. the articles are written by researchers who have proven themselves to be reliable. e. none of the above.
What general conclusion can we reach about making inferences during reading?
a. People are generally reluctant to make inferences unless they are convinced that the inference is justified. b. People consistently make inferences, especially if they have relatively poor metacomprehension skills. c. People often make inferences, especially if they have expertise in the topic. d. People are generally reluctant to make inferences unless someone specifically urges them to do so.
Which of the following ways of measuring explicit memory are usually the easiest for the person being tested?
a. Recognition b. Recall c. Relearning d. Referral
Carlos has a paper due in two weeks, but he is trying to meet a self-imposed deadline of 5:00 p.m. on Friday. Carlos's motivation is best explained by __________ theory.
A. expectancy B. goal-setting C. existence, relatedness, growth (ERG) D. leader-member exchange (LMX)