Briefly explain why the use of mixed methods lends themselves particularly well to single subject research
What will be an ideal response?
By its nature, single subject research is concerned with "telling a story" of one or more participants, the significant others involved, and the researchers themselves. This telling often involves discussing the overall validity of the study and its outcomes from various perspectives.
Qualitative methods can help explain trends and changes in the dependent variable that are not as evident or "objectively" identified via visual or statistical analyses.
Qualitative methods can help to explain confounding variables and events that impact the study's outcomes.
Qualitative methods can help in identifying biases or concerns of the researcher as well as other participants.
Qualitative methods can help identify nuances in the setting, participants, independent and dependent variables, etc. that assist others with understanding the external validity of a study.
You might also like to view...
Prayer at athletic contests are permissible if:
a. The coaches do not participate b. Students are not compelled to attend c. The school does not encourage prayer at these events d. None of the above
A method for ensuring that cultural identity will not be a basis for relating differently to students is
a. PRAXIS exams. b. Research. c. Self-examination. d. Peer tutoring.
The examples in this Chapter all emphasize that:
a. standards-based instruction requires only direct instruction of discrete skills. b. standards-based instruction is nearly impossible with students at so many literacy levels in our classrooms. c. teachers creating lessons using "backward mapping" and students taking an inquiry stance can achieve standards-based learning. d. differentiated instruction is impossible in the secondary content class.
What is the nativist viewpoint on school readiness based upon?
What will be an ideal response?