In CASE 18.2 Kelo v. City of New London (2005), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the "takings clause" of the U.S. Constitution's __________ Amendment now means __________ and a city can force private citizens to sell their houses and other property to a __________
a. First, a regulatory taking, private entity
b. Fifth, public use, public entity only
c. Fifth, economic development, private party
d. Fifth, a regulatory scheme, private party
c
You might also like to view...
The Bretton Woods conference convened by the UN near the close of WWII established two monetary institutions, _____________ and ___________.
What will be an ideal response?
Losses on sales of property between a taxpayer and his/her siblings are disallowed.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
According to the text, physical distribution cost tradeoffs enable firms to
A. resolve pricing conflicts among channel partners. B. minimize risk during test marketing of new products. C. reduce costs of all distribution functions simultaneously. D. resolve pricing conflicts within industry sectors. E. utilize resources for greatest cost-effectiveness.
Overnight package delivery is illustrative of which of the following sources of innovation?
a. incongruities b. unexpected occurrences c. process needs d. change in perception