One possible action by the writers could have been to encourage a boycott of movies and television programs produced by members of the AMPTP. A boycott would encourage viewers to refuse to watch any programming such programming. This tactic would not, unfortunately, prove to be too successful for the writers for at least two reasons. One, the strikers would have difficulty convincing viewers to give up their shows voluntarily. Two, given the size of the AMPTP, it would be extremely difficult to provide viewers with accurate information as to which shows they should boycott.
Another alternative to the boycott or a strike might have been to engage in a work slowdown or work-to-rule. Slowdowns would pressure the AMPTP by imposing costs through lowered productivity while still preserving the writers' jobs. However, a slowdown in this particular industry might anger viewers by lending unpredictability to the viewing schedule. This could possibly turn public sentiment toward the AMPTP and have the unfortunate effect of backfiring on the union.
Intermittent strikes might have been another alternative for the writers but intermittent strikes are less effective in an industry where there are lots of employers and alternative program options. In addition, as with the slowdown the intermittent strikes would create unpredictability in scheduling programs and could backfire on the union.
Finally, the writers could have embarked on a corporate campaign to create negative publicity for the AMPTP. Corporate campaigns can be very effective when safety is an issue or where there is clear management abuse because the public is more readily engaged in the story. However, no such abuses were at play in this situation where the primary concern was one of compensation. Given this, it would probably be more difficult garner public support.
Save a GPA. Donate your notes with us.
